Questions? +1 (202) 335-3939 Login
Trusted News Since 1995
A service for global professionals · Friday, March 29, 2024 · 699,696,552 Articles · 3+ Million Readers

Missouri Legislators Should Think Twice Before Repealing Motorcycle Helmet Law

Missouri’s mandatory motorcycle helmet law prevents serious brain injuries, keeps accident victims out of rehab hospitals, helps injured people go back to work and saves taxpayer dollars, say Columbia attorneys at Bley & Evans.

Columbia, MO, June 18, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Missouri lawmakers are debating repeal of the state's mandatory helmet law. That debate should be short and end with a resounding "no," says Columbia personal injury law firm Bley & Evans.  

0_int_BleyEvans-Logo.jpg


The current measure to repeal existing law, sponsored by Republican Sen. Dan Brown, would allow motorcyclists over the age of 18 to decide whether or not to wear a helmet. To cover the potential public cost of medical and rehabilitation care, riders who opt not to wear helmets would need to have at least $1 million worth of medical insurance coverage.  

The attorneys at Bley & Evans represent the victims of motorcycle accidents in personal injury lawsuits. They said unhelmeted riders risk chronic, disabling and life-altering head, neck and brain injuries, as well as untimely death.  

“Injuries suffered in motorcycle accidents can be devastating, especially if no helmet is worn,” said attorney Mark Evans. “Brain injuries are often permanent and crippling. We work with families trying to make the most of their lives after these accidents. Any legislator who’s done the work we do would likely have serious reservations about repealing this law.”

A severely injured motorcyclist could become totally disabled, unable to work and require a lifetime of ongoing personal, medical and rehabilitative care. The total cost for the harm done to the motorcyclist, his or her family and society in general could be several million dollars, Evans said.

Cathy Chase, president of Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, has stated that the decision should not be left  up to those who ride; rather, those who pay should have a say.

Proponents of the repeal cite personal freedom as the motivation behind their efforts, while advocates for keeping existing laws believe that injuries in serious motorcycle crashes have costs that extend well beyond the injured motorcyclist.

“Personal freedom and responsibility should be priorities for lawmakers,” said attorney Wally Bley. “But our laws must reflect a balance between our freedoms and our safety. When motorists are safer, we all benefit.”

About Bley & Evans:

Bley & Evans represents clients who have been injured in vehicle crashes, including motorcyclists. Find out more about the Columbia personal injury firm by visiting the Bley & Evans website.

Mark Evans
                    Bley & Evans Trial Attorneys 
                    844-443-8385
                    Evans@bleyevanslaw.com
                    

Powered by EIN News
Distribution channels: Law


EIN Presswire does not exercise editorial control over third-party content provided, uploaded, published, or distributed by users of EIN Presswire. We are a distributor, not a publisher, of 3rd party content. Such content may contain the views, opinions, statements, offers, and other material of the respective users, suppliers, participants, or authors.

Submit your press release